1. Preliminary
Discourse analysis used here begins with a chat transcribe language that naturally arise from the community of chatters or actors chatting in Yahoo Messenger Chat scope of the internet in the location of "Surabaya: 32". My purpose of this analysis is to describe how these communities to realize the meaning in the local context. The important thing here is the use of language or chat chat, human relationships that emerged based on CentOS, without the intervention of the researcher. The theory adopted by the discourse analysis confirms that the language is a source of culture and discourse is a cultural practice that is useful to eliminate blindness technology on ordinary people.Through language, culture is created, given meaning, learned, shaped, and reproduced. Through language we establish the relationship between cultural systems and various forms of social order. We can also see directly the position of the human community in the social order, and their understanding of the world / surroundings. Primarily aimed at the society to keep pace with the development of increasingly sophisticated technology.According to Brown and Yule (1996:1), expert of sociology and sociolinguistics, especially attracted to the use of language to establish and maintain social relationships. They also distinguish the types of discourse from two sides, ie the function of language and how to produce discourse or product. In this paper, when viewed in terms of language functions, entering the interactional discourse functions of language, namely the discourse contained in the dialogue and polilog.
As according to Halliday (1973) in Brown and Yule that divides language functions consist of:1. Instrumental function.2. Regulatory functions.3. Representational functions.4. Interactional functions.5. Function personal.6. Heuristic function.7. Imaginative function.If viewed in terms of how to produce discourse, including in the written text which is the range of sentences that described the kinds of writing.Social interaction is the principal means for people to interpret the phenomenon of the development functions of everyday language. Chatting use certain sentences as a source of understanding of a variety of activities, both important and trivial. We all socialized through language chat in written form via the Internet. Orolan was not separate from social interaction, culture, and personality.Analysis of human behavior do not always pay attention to the structure and function of the chatter that comes along with what was ditelusurinya. But in reality and in theory of language, emotive factors that dominate. It is very evident there are many things that are able to form or control language. Who is able to control emotions in expressing feelings through language.In addition to expanding our knowledge of language applications in technology, the purpose of this paper is to open up awareness of emotional control in speaking and personality postscript to the speaker under the weight of the emotion. According to the theory of discourse analysis, every human being is a linguist (in sharp contrast with Chomsky's theory). That is, we do not review or criticize the ability (competence) speaking person, but accept anything that is spoken by him as a greeting of good, true, perfect and brilliant even in its original context. More importantly, with this theory, the focus is shifted from sentence analysis and standard language grammar out of context, the speaker and his words are not separated from the context.Human speech obviously very dependent on the context for the production and interpretation. The goal is clearly not to classify the speech levels or correct the language so well and true, but to empower the speaker as a creature who understands various language variation and function. In other words, the aim is to see how they interpret the social needs around them. Structurally, it can be proved that every utterance establish or limit the next utterance.As an example, a question must be followed by an appropriate answer. We can be sure that the question 'where are you going' will not be answered with 'okay'. Although there are some questions and answers that have implicatures, but the questions and answers can be understood by the user. Thus, this chat chat studied with the purpose for which other users can understand.Functionally, chat are also arranged regularly by the speaker himself. The arrangement is a source of analysis that reflects how the chatters themselves interpret the emerging conversation in accordance with the norms of social-cultural discourse that is also formed. For example chat chat rules, anyone who started the topic of conversation, what can be discussed, who is entitled to say more, and others. Through this analysis, can be found in what must be known or followed for a person to act as a member of that community.In this paper, will be discussed further on the analysis of chat or chat based on cultural background influenced the times, understand the language of chat, and interpret the emotions that are created in the chat.The next discussion is expected to help balance the public's knowledge about language variation in language learning within the scope of Internet technologies. In this era of globalization is expected to bridge the language of relationships between individuals in order to remain harmonious. And expected to know the language form a very diverse community (comprised of communities) and understand the emotions that are created in the chat.
2. Research methods
In this study, researchers used a qualitative approach. Brown and Yule (1996:20) argues that discourse analysis is typically based on the language spoken by people who are not analysts. Papers tend to use inductive qualitative approach. Researchers in this case using a qualitative approach because he wanted to examine the functions of language from the influence of technological development based on modern culture, language forms chatters, chatters and emotions in language.In addition, the data is constructed in order to explain the various options, both formal and non-formal education available to speakers and writers. A more typical again, based on the progress of time data is taken from the text analyzer discourse written or electronic media.The data in this study were taken from the cafe (internet cafes) Indonet GOR Sidoarjo November 11, 2006 at 8:30 p.m. to 0:15 pm. This data is taken based on the stages:1. Copying chat chat perpetrator into a floppy disk.2. Transcribe in text form.3. Examining the actors chat dialog.
After collecting data researchers would like to take some steps to analyze the data as follows:1. Analyzing the chat or chat based on cultural background influenced the times.2. Understanding the language of chat.3. Interpreting the emotive who created the chat.
3. Discussion
Discourse that emerged were analyzed with a variety of social situations based on virtual chat or chat in a cafe located in GOR Indonet Sidoaarjo at night. At that time, researchers took data from Yahoo Messenger Chat in the room "Surabaya: 32". In this chat room chatters gender and age there is a secret or not. Researchers cite a portion of their conversation before and after it had been there a topic that may differ when the researchers cited.In excerpts of researchers, there are 15 chatters in the room "Surabaya: 32". Among them there are 7 active chatters like chatting and there are 8 chatters who just join the room (joining) but no chat activity, and there are left the room (left) room. Active chatters is pueeeh, dablyu_yu, eva_eox, abdee_cobain, need1fe, makelar_panci, and singa_xtreem. And passive chaterss is brewok_siluman, luapancinta, pengamat_payudara, sandhy_perindu, duda_miskin27, surga_abadi12, nandung_andung, and banjir_uang_hibah.In the excerpt, pueeeh start by asking what all the chatters who became the topic today. And it turns out they were talking about abdee_cobain with eva_eox. What's interesting here is how abdee_cobain and eva_eox form language that became public conversation.In this context, the topic being discussed is the envy of chatters on Abdee relationship with eva. Then came the form of emotive-emotive language that describes jealousy, hatred, and feeling mangkel. Dablyu and pueeeh for example, the most dominant Abdee taunted because their emotions are not controlled because of the language that emerged from the conversation. Through the intimate form of language against Abdee eva, which ditanggapinya with a similar form of language.In these excerpts show how a language has the power (emotive), which affects the recipient's speech. Details of the principal who appeared in the narrative are: a) menutur together through grammar mengikati words each, b) the emergence of unusual language chat in everyday life, and c) repetition (repeating words).Pueeeh interpreted that he had joined after the dialog is running (new chatters). Pueeeh asked what topic of conversation at that time and the chatters respond. What's interesting is that all forms of language equivalent.Each dialogue was established in harmony when the topic is the subject of jealousy expression of a pleasure that they are not natural. We had absolutely no idea what had happened to them respectively because of the narrative, each speaker helped one another. They like to construct a kind of division of iconic (iconic) in every speech, experience, and emotive chatters...to be continued...........
No comments:
Post a Comment